1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The Defendant is a driver who drives a private taxi B (hereinafter “instant taxi”), and the Plaintiff is a mutual aid business operator who has entered into a mutual aid agreement with respect to the instant taxi.

B. The Defendant: (a) while driving the instant taxi on April 14, 2015 in order to go to the her mother-friendly city located in the Jinando-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun on April 13:20, 2015; (b) while driving the instant taxi along one-lane between the two-lanes in front of the public harbor site located in the Geumsan-gun, Geumsan-gun, the Defendant: (c) deemed that C driving the two-lanes at the right edge of the instant taxi in the same direction in his front direction; (d) after changing the vehicle into the two-lane, it was found that C driving the two-lanes in the same direction at a speed of about 70 km in speed; and (d) after changing the two-lanes, it was found that the latter part of the instant taxi was the front part of the instant taxi.

The Defendant continued to drive the cab without taking a sudden action even though C was deprived of the fronter of the foregoing taxi, and eventually, C was killed due to a diversative long-term damage (paring and chest damage) between the street pole in front of C and the foregoing taxi.

(hereinafter collectively referred to as the “instant accident.”). The Defendant started driving the said taxi in the opposite direction while the 119 first aid team called out after shocking C and receiving a witness’s report, and went to the opposite direction while taking emergency measures against C. On the same day at around 13:40 on the same day, the police vehicle passed through the national highway No. 13 in the Geumsan-gun, Geumsan-gun, Geumsan-gun at around 13:40 on the same day, while passing through the national highway No. 13 in the front of the dialogue apartment in the Geumsan-gun, Geumsan-gun, Geumsan-gun. The Defendant expressed a desire for the victim E to pass a Fcar (hereinafter referred to as the “instant car”). The part on the back of the instant car was received about seven times as the instant taxi.

C. The Defendant: (a) caused the instant accident to murder C; (b) destroyed the instant taxi to the instant taxi, which is a dangerous thing; and (c) destroyed the instant car.