1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

The reasoning for this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance except for the modification as follows. Thus, this case is quoted in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

The part of the judgment of the court of first instance, which amended the plaintiffs, " shall be applicable," and the statement of No. 15 alone cannot be viewed any different from this (On the other hand, even if it is recognized that the plaintiffs' statements are identical to the plaintiffs' statements recognized as sexual harassment at the time of the disposition of this case, and thus, the above plaintiffs' statements cannot be used as the ground for the disposition of this case. However, when comparing the plaintiffs' statements recognized as the ground for the disposition of this case with the plaintiffs' statements and their expressions and contents, it is only more concrete that the defendant made the original disposition of this case. Thus, the identity of basic facts is recognized. Accordingly, even if the defendant made the plaintiffs' statements recognized as the ground for the disposition of this case, it cannot be viewed as adding a new ground for disposition or changing the ground for disposition."

Therefore, the decision of the first instance court is justifiable, and the plaintiffs' appeal is dismissed in its entirety due to the lack of grounds.