1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

The reasoning for this case is that the court which accepted the judgment of the court of first instance is identical to the entry of the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance except for the following modifications. Thus, this case is quoted in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

[Revision] Part of the first instance court's judgment "this court" in Part 18 of the third part of the judgment shall be "the court of first instance".

In the first instance judgment, the Defendant appears to have asserted that “.....” in the third instance judgment “(s)” should not be revoked since there is no need for medical care due to the injury and disease of this case even if proximate causal relation exists between the injury and the injury and the accident of this case. However, in an appeal litigation seeking revocation of an administrative disposition, the administrative agency can add or modify other reasons only to the extent that the underlying facts are recognized as identical to those of the accident of this case. In principle, it is not allowed to assert as a reason for disposition on the ground that there is a separate fact that the basic facts are not recognized (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2002Du5016, May 28, 2004). In addition, considering the overall purport of argument in the first instance judgment evidence No. 1, the Defendant’s assertion that there is no need to acknowledge a proximate causal relation between the accident of this case and the injury and the disease of this case, and there is no need to do so. Therefore, it does not require any additional medical care.”

The conclusion is.