logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2017.11.30 2017고단4161
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Part 1 (No. 1) of the seized place of business, Part 71 (Evidence. 1) of the Bank of Korea note 71.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On January 12, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for six months with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as the Mediation of Commercial Sex Acts, etc. at the Seoul Northern District Court (hereinafter “Seoul Northern District Court”), and the judgment was finalized on August 11, 2017.

1. From the end of March 2017 to May 25, 2017, the Defendant violated the Act on the Punishment of Acts, Including Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts (i.e., brokerage of commercial sex acts) (i., brokerage of commercial sex acts), 6 marina rooms installed in the first floor of the building underground in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Yeongdeungpo-gu, in operating a commercial sex business establishment by installing 2 shower rooms, etc., and received 80,000 to 120,000 won from customers, and 80,000 won and 120,000 won and more from the customers, and 30,000 won and more were earned by having female employees become aware of the customers’ sexual desire and engage in circumstances under the above conditions.

Accordingly, the defendant committed commercial sex acts such as arranging sexual traffic.

2. On May 11, 2017, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, while the police officer F belonging to the Seoul Yeongdeungpo-gu Police Station regulating the sexual traffic business at a sexual traffic business establishment listed in paragraph (1) around May 23:30, 201, controlled the sexual traffic business, the Defendant was unable to trace the sexual traffic women escaping from the rear side of the defective F in order to trace the sexual traffic women escaping at the scene.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the control of criminal acts.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of each police officer against G, H, I, and J;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. A protocol of seizure and a list of seizure;

1. Previous records: Investigation reports (Attachment of a copy of the judgment), decisions, and the application of Acts and subordinate statutes after inquiry;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 19(2)1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, Etc. of Arranging Sexual Traffic (the point of arranging sexual traffic for business purposes), Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties), and choice of imprisonment with labor;

1. The latter part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, provided that Article 39, Paragraph 1.

arrow