logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2016.08.23 2016누35955
취득세등부과처분취소
Text

1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation of this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance except for the dismissal or addition of the judgment of the first instance as follows. Thus, this is accepted in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Jin, at the bottom of the 6th judgment of the first instance court, the phrase " was found" was ", and there was a landscape gardening of the same species as the landscape trees planted on the land of this case, other than the landscape trees planted on the adjacent land."

B. From the 6th page of the judgment of the first instance court, the boundary line of the instant land and the adjoining land are set up in straight lines. The boundary line of the instant land and the adjoining land was partitioned by plucking up to be less than one square meter in the site area corresponding to the high-class house in the direction of the instant housing; and

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance is justifiable, and the plaintiffs' appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow