The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (misunderstanding of facts) ① the Defendant’s age and the Defendant’s person operating the company several times of loan and experience. ② The instant crime was committed by the Defendant at a branch of one bank designated under the order of non-person on the same day, by withdrawing the money deposited in his account by a third party who does not know at all by means of letters or telephone, and then transmitting the said money to the male number of books suffered from 20th early 20 seconds, so it could be sufficiently known that a person with social experience in the Defendant’s level was abnormal, ③ the Defendant’s act of withdrawing only KRW 50,00 as sales money to the bank employees upon the order of non-person, ④ The Defendant did not search the Defendant at all under the circumstances where it appears that there was no loan company or goods of this case, and the Defendant did not know that there was a large amount of money borrowed by 40% of the Defendant’s name and non-person’s name to whom the loan was given at least 200% of the Defendant’s financial content of this case’s loan.

It is reasonable to view it.

Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below that acquitted the Defendant on the facts charged of this case shall have affected the conclusion of the judgment.