logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2017.08.24 2017고단1395
사기방조
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On September 8, 2016, the Defendant: (a) by posting a phone to a non-name lender and then withdrawing the money deposited in a deposit account in the name of the Defendant from the person in a false name to the person who instructed the lending; (b) purchased the money in the name of the Defendant to lend KRW 5 million to the said non-name lender as security; and (c) given consent to the purchase of the motor vehicle in the name of the Defendant; and (d) given consent to the lending of KRW 5 million to the above non-name lender; and (b) notified the

On July 20, 2016, the Defendant transferred a e-mail card to the Defendant’s account for the purpose of obtaining a loan, but without receiving a loan, and suspended payment for the said account, the Defendant was aware of the fact that the scam criminal organization was receiving the money from the victims using another’s account under the name of the victim. The Defendant was aware of the process of receiving the loan already and conducting the loan, and it was well aware that the lending method of the above scam was an emergency method. The Defendant withdrawn the money deposited in the scam account under the name of the Defendant at the request of the other party when visiting the ordinary financial institution or upon the instruction of the above scamboxes, and the Defendant could be used for the scaming crime when withdrawing the money by withdrawing the money whose source of money deposited in the account of the other party’s account. The Defendant did not appear to have received the money from the scambling company in the name of the Defendant. The Defendant did not appear to have received the money from the scam account.

I think.

Nevertheless, on September 8, 2016, the defendant, without the intention or ability to make a loan by a person who has no name, calls to the victim C on the non-commercial land from Sep. 8, 2016.

arrow