The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. On June 19, 2012, around 08:10 on June 19, 2012, the Defendant made a public insult of the victim E (the age of 80) who had been living in front of the instant case before the instant case was reported by the victim E (the victim) by assaulting the Defendant before the instant case was reported by the victim, who was in front of the instant case, in order to unfold the victim by means of insulting the victim. The Defendant accused the victim and was investigated by the police in order to bring the victim out the case in which the said D, etc. was heard. The Defendant accused the victim at the time when he was not able to do so. It is bad.

2. We examine the judgment. The facts charged in the instant case are crimes falling under Article 311 of the Criminal Act, which can be prosecuted only when the victim files a complaint pursuant to Article 312(1) of the Criminal Act. According to the records, the victim can recognize the fact of revoking the complaint against the defendant on January 7, 2013, which is after the prosecution of the instant case was instituted. Thus, the prosecution of the instant case is dismissed pursuant to Article 327 subparag. 5 of the Criminal Procedure Act.