Defendant shall be punished by a fine for negligence in KRW 7,000,000 (live million).

If the defendant does not pay the above fine in full, 100.

Punishment of the crime

피고인은 2015. 2. 24. 22:16경 광주 서구 B에 있는 C 앞 편도 4차로 도로 중 1차로에서 D 쏘나타 차량을 정차시킨 채 술에 취해 운전석에 앉아 졸고 있던 중, 음주운전으로 의심되는 차량이 서 있다는 112신고를 받고 출동한 광주서부경찰서 E지구대 소속 경사 F로부터 차량에서 내릴 것을 요구받자 화가 나, 차량에서 내리면서 “야 짭새 새끼야, 뭐여, 이 짭새 새끼들아”라고 욕설을 하면서 오른발로 위 F의 오른쪽 허벅지를 1회 차고, 계속하여 “너희들 뭐여, 개새끼들 죽을래”라고 욕설을 하면서 손으로 F의 가슴을 밀치는 등 폭행하였다.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning F's handling of F's 112 Reporting Cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Examination protocol of suspect of the police accused;

1. Statement of the police officer F;

1. Each statement of the defendant and G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigative reports on the grounds other than photographs, 112 reported case handling lists, and criminal facts of violation of the Road Traffic Act, such as refusal of measurement of alcohol (Evidence Nos. 3, 6, 9).

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of fines, and the choice of fines;

1. In light of the circumstances leading up to the sentencing of Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act and the details of the crime, the Defendant requires a strict punishment.

However, in full view of the fact that the Defendant was separately sentenced to a fine for the crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act (recognition refusal) committed at the time of the instant case (Seoul District Court Decision 2015Da2181, 2015Da2181, 5 million won, 4 April 2015, 2015), and all other circumstances constituting the conditions for sentencing specified in the instant pleadings, the decision is made as per Disposition.