Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[Judgment of the court below] The defendant is a death penalty with C, and is the remainder of the net D.
On October 18, 1994, the Defendant received a trust with respect to the land owned by D prior to the birth of the network D, and registered the preservation of ownership in the name of the Defendant with respect to the land owned by 11,802 square meters of forest E, Gun, and 11,802 square meters of forest land under the name of the Defendant, and registered the transfer of ownership in the name of the Defendant with respect to the land other than 11,802 square meters of forest E, Gun, and
On August 29, 2012, 4, including C, filed a lawsuit against the Defendant on the claim for registration of transfer of ownership of the above real estate shares, and the Defendant’s written statement that “The instant real estate is the deceased’s property, and used the Special Measures Act on Convenience and used the Defendant’s name, etc.” submitted as evidence a sales contract for the said real estate’s 1/2 shares as the seller and the buyer of the said real estate.
【Inasmuch as the Defendant lost at the first instance court of the said civil lawsuit on November 21, 2013, the Defendant: (a) committed a forgery of a real estate transaction contract among the documents submitted by the Plaintiffs as evidence in the first instance trial in order to have the eight parcels of the said real estate that became the object of the lawsuit deducted; and (b) subsequently, (c) exercised the said contract by forging C
I tried to file a complaint.
On September 24, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around September 24, 2014, at the H attorney-at-law office in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Seocho-gu, (b) ordered C to prepare a false complaint against C with the intention of having C receive criminal punishment.
On February 27, 1997, the complaint submitted to the Busan District Court on May 29, 2013, a copy of the sale contract, which is a private document, as if it had been duly executed after drawing up a transaction agreement with the complainant and sealing the complainant, and selling the land owned by the complainant to the defendant. As such, C is punished as a crime of conducting the above document investigation, since it was done on May 29, 2013 by forging one copy of the transaction contract, which is a private document, as if it was duly formed.