beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and two months.
Seized evidence 1 or 2 shall be forfeited from the defendant.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. The general responsibility of the telephone financial fraud organization in the name of the public offering lies in the victim's contact with the victim by the mobile Messenger, and the victim's family or booms, and falsely demands the victims to transfer money to their own account. The victims shall transfer money to their own account. The victims shall secure cash cards and passbooks that can receive money from the victims through the victim's name in an irregular manner, and then the investigation agency, etc. shall request the victims to withdraw money from the victim's transferred money by using the above cash card and passbook, and the defendant who delivered the passbook and passbook secured and the cash card secured to the withdrawal book.
Accordingly, around September 15, 2014, a member of the telephone financial fraud assistance in the name of the accused would offer to the accused a cash card and passbook to be used in withdrawing the amount of damage caused by the above telephone financial fraud to be delivered to the unwritten withdrawal book, and the accused agreed to this.
As such, the Defendant conspiredd to commit the crime of telephone financial fraud with his or her namelight employees, such as telephone financial fraud total liability.
2. According to the aforementioned conspiracys as to the facts constituting the crime: ① on September 29, 2014, the above person under whose name was not the victim’s name was misrepresented by the victim’s mobile phone via the victim’s mobile phone at the victim’s location on September 29, 2014; ② “The above person under whose name was not the victim’s name was the victim’s H at a false place where the victim was the victim’s name was not the victim’s phone, and “The password was erroneously classified in order to engage in the Internet banking, and thus, he/she would return the false message instead of KRW 1.5 million to the F’s community credit cooperative account (G) managed by the victim, etc.; ② on October 1, 2014, the victim’s name was the victim’s H