logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원고양지원 2015.02.11 2014가단17834
대여금 등
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On December 1, 2011, the Defendant entered into a contract on behalf of the Defendant with respect to the advertisement of part of the outer part of the bus owned by Yangyang Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “B”) and inside the bus owned by B (hereinafter “B”) from December 1, 201 to November 30, 2013.

B. At around October 2013, 2013, Gohap requested the Defendant to increase the deposit money for the above advertising agency contract, the Defendant refused the renewal of the above contract and ordered Gohap to introduce the Plaintiff as a new advertising agent.

C. On November 1, 2013 and December 1, 2013, from December 1, 2013 to February 28, 2016, the Plaintiff entered into a contract on behalf of the Plaintiff for advertising (hereinafter “instant advertising agency contract”). D.

On November 1, 2013, the Plaintiff acquired the status of an advertising agency contract with the Defendant, and entered into a transfer contract with the Defendant (hereinafter “instant transfer contract”) with the following terms and conditions. The same month pursuant to the instant transfer contract.

2. The Defendant paid KRW 27,500,000 (hereinafter “the instant premium, etc.”) to the Defendant.

B In transferring advertising right, the defendant and the plaintiff enter into the following contracts in transferring B advertising right:

1. The total number of 98 vehicles ¡¿ 15,00 won = 1,470,000 won (excluding surtax) shall be deposited on the last day of each month for 28 months from November 1, 2013 to February 28, 2016;

2. In transferring the right to the right to internal advertising to the Plaintiff, the Plaintiff shall pay KRW 25 million to the Defendant.

E. B concluded a direct advertising contract with the United Nations upon termination of the advertising media use contract with the United Nations. At the same time, the United Nations terminated the instant advertising agency contract with the Plaintiff on November 25, 2013.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, Eul evidence 2-1, 2, Gap evidence 3-1, 2, Gap evidence 7, Eul evidence 1, Eul evidence 5, and arguments.

arrow