logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.02.05 2013가합74078
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The Plaintiff:

A. The Defendants’ respective KRW 52,250,185 per annum from September 1, 2013 to February 5, 2015.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On May 1, 201, the Plaintiff, engaged in an advertising agency business, etc., entered into a contract with D Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “D”), which provides that the Plaintiff has the right to advertise inside and outside of the buses owned by D (hereinafter “instant contract”), and the main contents thereof are as follows.

Article 2 (Subject Matter of Contract)

1. Advertisements: All the outdoor or internal commercials (including tampab, information and broadcast advertisements);

2. Quantity: The contract period under Article 4 (Contract Period) shall be three years from May 1, 201, and the contract shall be automatically extended for three years from May 1, 201, if no objection is raised in writing by one month prior to the completion of the contract;

Article 5 (Charges for Use of Media)

1. The plaintiff shall pay 110,000 won per month for each defendant company the user fee for media use.

2. The media user fee shall be paid monthly.

Article 6 (Termination of Contract) The defendant company and the plaintiff may terminate the contract even during the term of validity in the following cases:

2. Article 7 (Compliance with Acts and Subordinate Faith and Good Faith)

1. The defendant company may not arbitrarily remove the plaintiff's advertising materials during the contract period, and may not enter into an advertising contract with any similar contract or double contract or with any other company other than this contract.

B. According to the instant contract, the Plaintiff has the right to advertise the entire advertising area of 17 buses and 19 buses for 17 and 2 F-2 buses owned by D (hereinafter “instant bus”) and entered into an advertising contract with 13 advertisers (hereinafter “instant advertisers”), including G Council members and HP, etc. (hereinafter “instant advertisers”), and has been engaged in advertising activities through the outside, inside, marketing, and guidance broadcast of the instant bus.

On the other hand, at the plaintiff's expense, the plaintiff is not more than 'the items listed in the attached list, including information broadcasting equipment, etc. in the bus of this case.

arrow