The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the punishment of the original court (one year and six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable;

On the other hand, the defendant argues that he himself, as a unemployment owner of the game of this case, only committed the crime of this case, and that he did not participate in the crime of this case. However, according to evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court below, the defendant can sufficiently be recognized that he committed the crime of this case in collusion with C as stated in the facts charged of this case. Thus, this part of the defendant's assertion is without merit.

2. There are extenuating circumstances, such as the fact that the defendant was waiting for committing the instant crime, the fact that the defendant voluntarily surrenders to the police, and the defendant's support is being put to the police.

However, the crime of this case is a matter of exchanging the result of the defendant's game room business using game products or non-grade game products different from the contents of the defendant's classification. Such crime is highly harmful to society by encouraging the people's excessive gambling spirit and undermining their sound work awareness. Notwithstanding the control and punishment of investigation agencies, the defendant committed the crime continuously, repeatedly, and systematically by using the means that he had the president, etc., despite the control and punishment of investigation agencies, and the defendant committed the crime of this case. The defendant already committed the crime of this case without having had the record of punishment for the same kind of crime even though he had already been punished, he was in the period of repeated crime, and even if the defendant voluntarily surrenders to the police, it is only the reason for the court's voluntary mitigation, and it is merely the reason for the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, motive and circumstance leading to the crime of this case, circumstances before and after the crime, etc. Thus, the defendant's assertion cannot be accepted.

3. Thus, the defendant's appeal is without merit.