(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2020.05.14 2019고정792

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2020.05.14 2019고정792

상해

Text

The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is aware of the work related to the production of B and the foreign program and is in the space.

B around 23:00 on September 5, 2018, 2018, on the ground that “the taxi located in the north-do border in China did not comply with the opinions of the defendant when drinking other kinds of driving and drinking such as the defendant.” On the hand hand, he was able to blick the defendant's breath with his breath floor, and blick the defendant's breath, and blick the defendant's face and body of the defendant's body in drinking.

In addition, B around 00:10 on September 6, 2018, around 00:0:0 on the street in front of the boarding house located in the North Korean border, for the above reasons, the Defendant and the dispute are punished;

With respect to the Defendant’s bating, face and hot body, the Defendant inflicted an injury on the Defendant, which requires approximately three weeks of patch treatment.

The Defendant, at the above temporary location, dumped B with B for the foregoing reasons, and dump B with her hand, and caused injury to B, which requires approximately three weeks of treatment of her face and body in drinking, to B for approximately three weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement made by witnesses B in the third protocol of the trial;

1. Statement made by C of a witness in the fifth trial record;

1. The defendant's assertion on the investigation report (as to the submission of the injury diagnosis report) argues that the defendant was unilaterally satisfed from B, and that he did not inflict any injury upon B when satisfe B was fatd. However, according to the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court, the defendant was found to have inflicted any injury on B (the satfe C was present as a witness in this court, and it was difficult for the defendant to have been satisfed by B as a witness in this court, and later, although the defendant was unilaterally sought from the defendant, the defendant was stated to have been satisfed with B at the first time). The above argument by

Application of Statutes

1. Criminal facts;

유사 판례

-서울중앙지방법원 2015.08.28 2014고정5309

-수원지방법원 2015.09.10 2009고단5028 (2)

-전주지방법원 군산지원 2016.12.21 2016고단1113

-인천지방법원 2015.03.30 2014고단8485

-대구지방법원 2020.01.31 2019고정1175