The defendant shall be innocent.

1. The facts charged against the victim B (75) and the victim C (66 years old) are simple married couple, and both the victims and the defendants live in adjoining areas.

On September 21, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 17:00 on September 21, 2017, in front of the Victim B’s house located D; (b) why the Defendant talked with a neighbor, the Defendant was not having a door on the side of the road.

“The Defendant is the head of Dong and Dong Ban” at the end.

Whether South or North Korea is Earson????????

“In the end, the victims were injured by the Defendant, and the Defendant met with the blue part and the right kne part of the victim’s blue kne knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee kne knee kne kne kne kne kne, etc., which require treatment for about 14 days to the victim, respectively.

2. Determination

A. In a criminal trial, the conviction of guilt ought to be based on evidence of probative value, which leads a judge to the conviction that the facts charged are true beyond a reasonable doubt. If there is no evidence to form such a conviction, even if there is suspicion of guilt against the defendant, the determination is inevitable in the interests of the defendant.

B. Comprehensively taking account of the following circumstances revealed by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court, the evidence produced by the prosecutor alone was proven to the extent that there is no reasonable doubt as to the facts charged.

It is difficult to see, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

1) The victim C made a statement that “the Defendant and the victim B did not directly witness one another when investigating the suspect of the police office which is a police office, and the victim B took a look at the victim B’s hand in a situation where the victim B takes the defendant’s hand.”