The defendant shall be innocent.

1. On October 30, 2016, the Defendant: (a) was assaulted by the victim E in front of the D printing office located in C at Syang-si on October 30, 2016; (b) was set up against the victim E; and (c) was inflicted an injury on the victim, i.e., a part of right hand over the right hand, which requires treatment for about 28 days.

2. Determination

A. In a criminal trial, the conviction of guilt ought to be based on evidence of probative value, which leads a judge to the conviction that the facts charged are true beyond a reasonable doubt. If there is no evidence to form such a conviction, even if there is suspicion of guilt against the defendant, the determination is inevitable in the interests of the defendant.

B. Comprehensively taking account of the following circumstances revealed by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court, the evidence produced by the prosecutor alone was proven to the extent that there is no reasonable doubt as to the facts charged.

It is difficult to see, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

1) The victim stated in this court that “No. Ga was found from the floor (s) and sold after being sealed by the Defendant,” and even if so, there was the Defendant’s assault.

However, it seems that it was not against the violence of the victim.

B. The victim stated at the investigative agency that "the defendant was given treatment by putting the head debt in front of the defendant's post, putting the head debt in front of the future, putting the defendant's head debt in front of the defendant's past and going beyond the defendant's degree (the 50th page of the evidence record) and putting the defendant's head debt in front of the defendant's appearance (the 50th page of the evidence record)," and the victim recognized the fact that the defendant was suffering from the defendant's head debt after the above go beyond the victim's head. Rather, the injured person was the head of the defendant before the above situation occurs.