The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The gist of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (three million won of a fine) is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. The crime of this case on board is disadvantageous to police officers H, who called upon 112 reported telephones by the Defendant, in view of the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant committed the crime of this case on board: (b) “A civilian stick has been distorted in this place; (c) how Hner memorys are memoryed; (d) I kn't kn't kn't kn's chest; and (d) the Defendant interfered with a police officer’s legitimate execution of his duties by assaulting the police officer on his hand in order to prevent him from departing from continuing departure; (c) the crime is not good in light of the circumstances and contents of the crime; (d) the Defendant led to the confession and reflect of the crime of this case; (e) there was no previous conviction; and (e) other criminal records and arguments, such as the Defendant’s age and happiness environment; and (e) circumstances before and after the crime, etc., the sentence against the Defendant is too unreasonable.

3. If so, the prosecutor's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed under Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.

(However, in the first sentence of the criminal facts of the judgment of the court below, the "Defendant F" is clear that it is an error entry of "Defendant B", and such error is corrected ex officio in accordance with Article 25 (1) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure.