logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.03.26 2019고단681
공무집행방해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of four million won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. At around 02:30 on December 27, 2018, the Defendant: (a) committed an assault on the street in front of the exit 2 in the front of the front of the front of the front 2nd of the front of the front 2ndle of the Seoul Dongjak-gu Seoul Western Police Station B District on the ground that the police officer, who was a police officer of the Dongjak-gu Seoul Police Station B District, dispatched to the site after receiving a report 112, the Defendant: (b) taken two-time back the uniforms of the above C on the ground that the police officer, who was a police officer assigned to the front 2nd of the Defendant’s vehicle, was protruding the Defendant who was divingd on the rear seat of the Defendant; and (c) even after getting off the said vehicle, the Defendant assaulted twice the front left side of the above C on two occasions and walking the right bridge once.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the handling of 112 reported duties and maintenance of order.

2. The Defendant damaged public goods at around 03:00 on December 27, 2018, on the ground that he does not cover a lock, he was released from a zone B located in Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D, by having “I am rapidly, because I have died of scarb, because I have scarbed, and scarbly died of scarbly.” The Defendant was promptly released from the zone B located in Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

Accordingly, the Defendant damaged the sofash used by public offices to maintain its utility by destroying the repairing cost equivalent to 198,000 won at the market price.

The repair cost shall be specified according to the estimates submitted by the defendant to this court.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. E statements;

1. Notification of departments related to 112 reported cases, and application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning violence-related photographs;

1. Relevant Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 141(1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 141(1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of each fine for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The crime is removed, where a police officer assaultss a police officer on the ground that the reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order has broken down.

arrow