The judgment of the court below is reversed.

The sentence of sentence shall be suspended for the defendant.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. On September 2, 2013, 2013, the Defendant was assaulted by the victim, who was frightened by the victim, and was frightened by the victim, and was frightened by the victim. On September 30, 2013, when the Defendant was assaulted by the victim on the ground that the female fright does not exist, the Defendant was frighten by hand with the victim’s face, and the Defendant’s act constitutes a justifiable act.

The court below erred by misunderstanding of facts or misunderstanding of legal principles.

B. The lower court’s sentence of unreasonable sentencing (one million won of fine) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. As to the assertion of mistake of facts, according to the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below (in particular, evidence records 8 pages of evidence records), the fact that the defendant suffered the body of the victim with the hand saw while he/she had a verbal dispute with the victim, can be acknowledged that such an act is justifiable.

(2) Next, with respect to the crime of September 30, 2013, the following circumstances revealed by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court below, namely, ① the victim stated that the victim was at the time of the victim’s face by cryp survey, i.e., the victim was at the time of the victim’s face by hand, etc., the video of the damaged photograph (33 pages of the evidence record) corresponds to the above statement, ② the defendant was at the time of the victim’s crypous assault from the victim, and ③ the defendant was at the time of the victim’s cryp survey, and the defendant appears to have been at the time of the victim’s cryp survey, and the fact that the victim’s face was at the time of the victim’s hypology, etc. cannot be viewed as justifiable, and it cannot be viewed as justifiable.

(3) Therefore, the court below erred by misapprehending the facts charged in this case.