The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. misunderstanding of facts and misunderstanding of legal principles mean that an assault from the victim first refers to "dyle" from the defense source, and the defendant spreads the part of A once by hand, and the court below found the victim guilty of this part of the facts charged even though the victim did not have any harming the victim by pushing the victim's right shoulder or walking the victim's right shoulder at hand, or by walking the victim's right lower part of leaving the right lower part of the victim's right lower part of the charges, or by misunderstanding the legal principles of self-defense, which affected the conclusion of the judgment.

B. The lower court’s sentence of unreasonable sentencing (one million won of fine) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

가. 사실오인 주장에 대한 판단 원심이 적법하게 채택하여 조사한 증거들에 의하여 인정되는 다음과 같은 사정, 즉, ① 피고인이 피해자에게 페인트 도색을 도급하였는데, 페인트의 종류 및 비용에 이견이 있어서 서로 말다툼하게 된 점, ② 목격자 E는 검찰 조사 당시 어떻게 몸싸움을 했느냐는 질문에 “여자들끼리 하는데 심하게 했겠습니까 서로 툭닥거리는 정도였습니다.”고 진술하여 서로 몸싸움이 있었다는 취지로 진술한 점(증거기록 제482쪽), ③ 피해자가 수사기관 및 원심 법정에서 일관되게 피해 사실을 진술하고 있는 점, ④ 피해자가 이 사건 폭행을 당한 다음날인 2010. 9. 10. 상해진단서를 발급받은 점 등을 종합하면 피고인이 피해자에게 원심 판시와 같은 상해를 가한 사실을 인정할 수 있다.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion of mistake is without merit.

B. In light of the legal principles’ assertion, the act of attack and defense can be deemed as legitimate self-defense for the purpose of defense by leaving only one of the acts of attack and defense at the same time, since the act of attack and defense are continuously cross-sectioned and defensive acts are simultaneously conducted.