logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2020.09.10 2019고단5006
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 10, 201, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 1 million as a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act from the Ulsan District Court on June 10, 201.

On November 3, 2019, at around 22:48, the Defendant driven a DNA cargo vehicle at approximately 500 meters away from the roads near Ulsan-gun B market in Ulsan-gun to the roads front of Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-gun, while under the influence of alcohol 0.160% of alcohol level.

Accordingly, the Defendant violated the prohibition of driving under the influence of alcohol not less than twice.

2. The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of a DNA cargo vehicle in violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and the Road Traffic Act.

On November 3, 2019, at around 22:48, the Defendant proceeded with the front road of Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-gun, at a sloping speed from the southwest to the E village.

At the time, there is a road where the center line of the yellow-ray is installed at night, so a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to safely operate the steering system by accurately operating the steering and steering gear.

Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol and was driven by the Victim F (Age 50) who was in the process of proceeding beyond the central line and was driving by the Victim F (Age 50). The front part of the G rocketing passenger car was the front part of the said cargo vehicle.

At the same time, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as salt ties and tensions, which require approximately two weeks of medical treatment due to occupational negligence as above, and at the same time damaged the said rocketing car in a amount equivalent to KRW 4,409,931.

3. The Defendant violated the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act, without having subscribed to mandatory insurance at the aforementioned date and place, operated the said cargo truck.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written statement;

1. A report on the occurrence of a traffic accident and an accident site photograph;

1. Any notification of the results of the crackdown on drinking driving and any drinking driver;

arrow