The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (amounting to five million won, confiscation) is too unreasonable.

2. Although there are circumstances that may be considered in light of the circumstances, such as the fact that the defendant's mistake is recognized and is against the defendant's will, the act of arranging sexual traffic is not so serious social harm, such as harming the sound sexual culture and good morals by commercializing women's sex, and thus preventing the spread of illegal sexual traffic establishments, and establishing a sound sexual culture, and the defendant has been punished for the same crime, there is no special change in circumstances after the decision of the court below, and there is no special change in circumstances after the decision of the court below, and all the sentencing conditions of this case, such as the defendant's age, sexual behavior, occupation and environment, motive and circumstance of the crime, etc., are considered in light of the above circumstances favorable to the defendant, the court below's punishment is too unreasonable even if considering the above circumstances favorable to the defendant.

Therefore, we cannot accept the defendant's above assertion.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.