The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the grounds for appeal (limited to imprisonment for eight months, one year of suspended execution, one year of additional collection, 33,986,00 won) is too unreasonable.

2. Although there are circumstances that may be considered in light of the circumstances, such as the fact that the defendant's mistake is recognized and is against the defendant, there is no punishment for the same crime, the closure of the business establishment of this case after the sentence of the judgment below, the aged, etc. However, the act of arranging sexual traffic is in need of strict punishment in order to prevent the spread of illegal sexual traffic business establishments without considerable social harm, such as harming the sound sexual culture and good morals by commercializing women's sex, and to establish a sound sexual culture. In addition, comprehensively taking into account all the sentencing conditions that are shown in the records and arguments of this case, such as the period and profits of arranging sexual traffic in this case, the age, character and behavior, occupation and environment, motive and circumstance after the crime, etc. of the defendant, even if considering the favorable circumstances of the defendant as seen earlier, the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable.

Therefore, we cannot accept the defendant's above assertion.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.