Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 1.5 million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who operates a singing practice room with a trade name called “Ck practice room” in Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

No karaoke machine business operator shall sell or provide any alcoholic beverage.

Nevertheless, at around 02:30 on March 5, 2017, the Defendant violated the obligations of the karaoke machine business operator by providing the instant karaoke machine (47 years of age) and one other than the customers with 102 Kinginging room, with 1 ambling-si and 1 ambling-si, 1 ambling-si, and 1 ambling-si.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness E and F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes, such as a certificate of registration of karaoke machine business and field photographs;

1. Article 34(3)2 and Article 22(1)3 of the Music Industry Promotion Act on criminal facts; Article 1 of the fine; Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act on the Detention in Labor House; Defendant and defense counsel asserted that the attorney-at-law, who had been engaged in legal counseling, has been engaged in inspection for the purpose of legal counseling.

The following circumstances acknowledged by the records of this case, i.e., police E and F, which were called at the time of the dispatch, stated that D and G were singing and singing at the time of the dispatch, ② After the dispatch, E and F heard G by dividing them into “D” and “F has done legal counseling services”. After the Defendant’s intervention, E stated that “D had interfered with the legal counseling services” in the first time, and F changed “D was sent off outside the place of the drinking house.” However, F stated that “D was sent off outside the place of the drinking house,” and that the Defendant’s intervention was changed to “I am playing at the place of the drinking house,” and that if D had engaged in legal counseling services as alleged by the Defendant, it was entirely said that the Defendant and G at the time of regulating the legal counseling services by the police officers.”