logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 장흥지원 2013.08.29 2013고단118
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등협박)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date of the final judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around January 22, 2013, the Defendant violated the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (collectively, deadly weapons, etc.) made a threat to the victim on the ground that E, the Defendant, in the course of assaulting the victim F (year 41), she was a dangerous object under the custody of the victim F (age 41), on the ground that the victim said E, during the course of assaulting the victim F (age 41), on the ground that he was the victim, the Defendant she laid off the beer’s disease, which is a dangerous object under the custody in the cooling house at the relevant place, and broken the beer’s disease into the table, and then broken it into the brupted list of the victims, and threatened the victim.

2. On January 22, 2013, at around 22:50 on January 22, 2013, the Defendant: (a) reported by the Victim F on the same ground as paragraph (1); (b) stated the damage situation to the Defendant, such as a slope in the Heungung Police Station, which was called out after having been reported by the Victim F on the same ground as paragraph (1); (c) was an injury to the victim F’s face by the Defendant’s fault at one time, resulting in an injury to the victim F

3. The obstruction of performance of official duties, the Defendant, at around 23:00 on January 22, 2013, was arrested as a flagrant offender at the parking lot in front of the police box located in Heung-gun C for the same reason as that of paragraph (1), and was transferred to the He police box after being arrested from the victim of the Heung-gun Police Station, the victim of the Heung-gun Police Station, who was called out after receiving a report for the same reason as that of paragraph (1), and was carried out as a flagrant offender at the police box. On the other hand, the Defendant was deprived of both horses and shoes

The defendant demanded that the victim be able to do so, and the victim was kneeker with knenee who was well aware of the fact and knee in order to be kneen, and the victim was kneeker with a single level of the victim's knee who was kneekne in order to give medical treatment for about two weeks

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on arrest of flagrant offenders, and at the same time injured the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol regarding E;

1. Each police statement made to I, G, and F;

1. Statement;

arrow