The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The body of the victim caused by the instant accident is not likely to cause any trouble to daily life, and it is difficult to view that there is no need to treat the body of the victim as an infringement on the health condition of the victim, and thus, it cannot be evaluated as an injury under the Criminal Act.

Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below that found all the charges, including the charges of the escape vehicle, guilty, is erroneous and adversely affected by the judgment.

B. The sentence of the lower court’s unfair sentencing (one year of imprisonment, one year of suspended execution, 40 hours of community service, and 40 hours of lecture of compliance driving) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. In light of the following facts and circumstances, i.e., the victim: (a) visited K Jeong-type medical staff on May 26, 2016, which is the date of the instant traffic accident; (b) received physical treatment, such as table heat treatment, in-depth heat treatment, interference current treatment, rehabilitation low-power radar treatment; and (c) the victim knew the husband of the instant accident and talks with the purport that “the part of this case is Aphhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhgggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggghhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh