logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2013.09.27 2013고정1639
강제집행면탈
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be paid.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the actual representative of D Co., Ltd. (Co., Ltd. E and F before the change) for the purpose of interior works, etc. in Gwangjin-gu Seoul and 1105.

G acquired the claim of KRW 6,710,210 against H and I Company D and notified the Defendant of the fact around May 25, 2012.

The defendant had a mind to evade compulsory execution by closing an existing business entity that is likely to be forced by G and establishing a new business entity and transferring existing business partners, etc.

The Defendant, around June 15, 2012, transferred the ownership of J and KSS car 2 owned by D Co., Ltd. in the name of Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City (Seoul Special Metropolitan City Gwangjin-gu) to the Defendant. On July 2012, 2012, the Defendant closed the said Co., Ltd. D and transferred the expectation right to make transactions with D with D and receive transaction payment in the name of the Defendant at the same place as the Defendant’s name by establishing a new business entity that is “F” in the name of the Defendant. However, the written indictment for D Co., Ltd. is written as the Defendant. However, the content of the facts charged itself appears to be an obvious error of

The property was concealed for the purpose of evading compulsory execution by making it impossible to enforce compulsory execution against it.

Summary of Evidence

1. The statement of each part of the police suspect examination protocol against the defendant;

1. Statement of each police statement concerning G or L;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Article 327 of the Criminal Act and Article 327 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime, the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The grounds for conviction of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act for the crime of evading compulsory execution under Article 327 of the Criminal Act include not only movable property but also movable property, but also claims, etc. that can be subject to compulsory execution or preservative measures under the Civil Execution Act, and it is compulsory execution to conceal property.

arrow