1. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendant A and B jointly and severally share KRW 700,147,338 and KRW 456,165,473 among them

1. Each of the facts stated in the separate sheet No. 1, No. 2, and No. 2-1, No. 2, and No. 3 in the judgment on the cause of the claim does not conflict between the Plaintiff and the Defendants, or can be acknowledged by adding the whole purport of the pleadings to the whole purport of the pleadings.

According to the above, as the plaintiff seeks within the scope of the claim established by each preceding judgment, the defendant Gap corporation and Eul jointly and severally, as to 700,147,338 won and 456,165,473 won among them, shall be liable to pay 14% per annum from March 30, 2004 to June 29, 2004, 16% per annum from June 30, 2004 to December 31, 2004, and 20% per annum from the next day to the day of full payment. The remaining defendant C, D, E, F, and G shall be jointly and severally with each defendant corporation, Eul, and 40% per annum from 20,029,467 won to 304, 204, 305, 46.45% per annum from 140% per annum to 30,46.5% per annum, 204 to 30,536.45% per annum

2. As to the determination of Defendant C, E, and G’s assertion, on the grounds that Defendant C, and C, and E approved their respective limitations on the inheritance from the deceased H, but in fact, they cannot respond to the Plaintiff’s claim on the grounds that they did not have any active property inherited from the deceased. However, the inheritor who granted the limited approval is wholly succeeded to the Plaintiff’s claim (the existence of the obligation), but is liable for the repayment only within the scope of the inherited property, not its own property, and thus, the Defendants limited the inheritance from the deceased H (the limitation of liability).

The Defendants, as successors to inherited debts, are from the deceased H.