Main Issues
Cases where there is an error in the omission of judgment as to the statement of the reason for denying the establishment of a crime under law;
Summary of Judgment
In light of the special characteristics of military units, there is an error of law by failing to make a judgment on the assertion that there is no possibility of not complying with the instructions of superior officers, regarding the statement of the reason for excluding the establishment of a crime under Article 368(2) of the former Military Court Act (wholly amended by Act No. 3993, Dec. 4, 87).
[Reference Provisions]
Article 368(2) of the Military Court Act, Article 323 of the Criminal Procedure Act
Appellant, Defendant
Appellant
Judgment of the lower court
High Military Port 628 delivered on April 10, 1963, 628, such as the Korean Army Army, the Korean Army, the Korean Army, the Korean Army, the Korean Army, etc.
Text
the original judgment shall be reversed.
The case shall be remanded to the Army, High School, and Military Council.
Reasons
The first ground for appeal of attorney Park Jong-chul is examined.
According to the first ground of prosecution as to the defendant's defense counsel's submission in the order of the court below, it is obvious that the court below did not make any decision according to the original judgment despite the assertion of the fact falling under Article 368 (2) of the Military Court Act, because it is obvious that the defendant's defense counsel did not make any judgment on this argument because it is obvious that the court below did not make any judgment on this argument because it is against the previous precedents (4287 Form 73) of the court's previous precedents (4287 Form 73) that the court's decision was unlawful since the defendant's judgment was unlawful because he did not have a considerable interest in the organization life of the special military officer with severe common interests as in this case. Accordingly, it is reasonable to conclude that the defendant's judgment was unlawful. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices pursuant to Articles 438 (1) and 439 (2) of the Military Court Act.
Judge Lee Young-su (Presiding Judge) of the Supreme Court Justice Lee Young-chul (Presiding Judge)