Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a director of the reconstruction and consolidation project association in South-gu, Dong-gu, Seoul as a director of the partnership.

An executive of a reconstruction and improvement project association shall comply with the request within 15 days, where a member makes a request for perusal of the documents and related data concerning the implementation of a rearrangement project.

Although the Defendant received a written request from D, a member of the said union, to July 3, 2016, to duplicate documents regarding the implementation of the rearrangement project, such as the details of expenses and contract details, on a total of three occasions, as shown in the attached crime list, from around June 3, 2016 to around July 7, 2016, the Defendant did not comply with the Plaintiff’s request to duplicate documents regarding the implementation of the rearrangement project.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement protocol (D);

1. Requests for reproduction of each contract;

1. A certificate of all matters to be registered (C apartment);

1. Certification of each content:

1. Requests for duplication of the contract (proof of contents - June 16), replies, requests for duplication of the contract (proof of contents), and details of copies of each contract;

1. Each investigation report (in case of complaint D telephone conversations, suspect A telephone conversations) (the defendant and his defense counsel asserts as follows:

At the time when the defendant received a request for duplication from D, he/she had both the duties of the president of the partnership and the status of director as stated in the facts charged, and the request for duplication was received as an agent for the president of the partnership, so he/she is not guilty because he/she did not have the status prescribed in Article 86 subparagraph 6 of the Act on

Summary of Evidence

According to each of the records, at the time D applied for duplication as stated in the facts of the crime, the recipient of the written application is indicated as "A person performing the duties of the association of the National Association of the National Association of the National Association of the National Association of the National Association of the National Association of the National Association of the National Association of the National Association of the National Association of the National Association of the National Association of the National Association of the National Association of the National Association of the National