A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Even if the Defendant is not a person handling narcotics,

1. On October 2012, at around 16:00 on the first day of October 2012, the Defendant’s DNA car parked in the vicinity of Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, administered in a way that the amount equivalent to 0.03g of the Defendant’s DNA car, which is psychotropic drugs dry from E, is administered in a way that the amount equivalent to 0.03g of the Mesopha (hereinafter referred to as “losophopon”);

2. At approximately 02:00 on November 14, 2012, in the vicinity of F, located in Ansan-si, an area equivalent to 0.03g of philopon E, administered by means of clopon on the required part;

3. At around 13:20 on November 15, 2012, after having clopon amounting to 0.03g of coponon from E, administered in a way that clopons are listed on the required copon;

4. On November 201, 2012, at around 15:00 on the lower order of November 1, 2012, the tran car parked in the vicinity of the H Terminal in Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, in a method of hanging at the request of 0.03g of philopon 0.03g of the philopon received from I;

5. On the 15:00 on the first day of December 2012, administered in the above Trate car parked in the vicinity of Seongdong-gu Seoul High Court at around 15:0,00, in a way that the car is administered in another way, equivalent to 0.03g of the philopon 0.03g from I, and

6. Around 15:00 on January 10, 2013, the aforementioned Twit Car parked in the vicinity of the Dongdaemun-gu Seoul KRA, Dongdaemun-gu, was administered in a way that the car was administered in a way that the amount equivalent to 0.03g of the instant Twitphone 0.03g of the philopon clopon c.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each protocol concerning the examination of the accused by the prosecution (including the part concerning the statement of the E);

1. Copy of the protocol concerning suspect interrogation of E;

1. A copy of each prosecutor's statement concerning L and E;

1. A written request for appraisal;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (verification of transaction prices of narcotics);

1. Article 60 (1) 2, Article 4 (1), and subparagraph 3 (b) of Article 2 of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc. (or each choice of imprisonment, etc.) concerning the relevant criminal facts and the selection of punishment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Suspension of execution;