beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The names, who are the total responsibility of the telecommunications-based financial fraud (hereinafter referred to as the "scam") organization, organize various stages, such as deceptions, management measures, and cash withdrawal measures, and the investigators belonging to the deceptions make a false statement that many and unspecified persons would have the staff of the financial institution by misrepresenting them at a low interest rate and making them borrow money at a low interest rate by misrepresenting them with telephone without permission, thereby allowing people to deposit money with the account in the name of cash withdrawal in the name of the cash withdrawal in the name of the existing loan, and the trillion staff belonging to the management measures are committing the crime by soliciting cash withdrawals and making the cash withdrawals deposited into the account in the name of the cash withdrawals, in series, by holding them at the designated place or remitting it to another account.
On March 15, 2018, the Defendant: (a) received a proposal from a person without the name of the Defendant (a member of the company B), stating, “I would pay 5% of the deposit amount to the account by withdrawing and delivering the money deposited in the account due to tax issues; and (b) notified the account number (C) of a national bank in the name of the Defendant on March 15, 2018.”
On March 16, 2018, an employee under the name of the Singishing shall deposit money with the account known as being 80,000 won due to the lack of credit which makes it possible to make a loan by misrepresenting the victim D by telephone to a financial institution.
‘Falsely speaking, the victim made the victim pay 10 million won to the above national bank account in the name of the defendant at around 11:54 on the same day.
As a result, the Defendant aided and aided the above phishing fraud by making it easier for the Defendant to commit the phishing fraud.
Summary of Evidence
1. A protocol of examination of part of the defendant by prosecution;
1. Statement made to D by the police;
1. Details of deposits, CCTV data, and the application of statutes on E data;
1. Article 347(1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and the choice of punishment;