logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구고등법원 2016.01.22 2015누6461
퇴교처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The grounds alleged by the plaintiff in the trial while filing an appeal by the court of first instance are not significantly different from the contents alleged by the plaintiff in the court of first instance, and the judgment of the court of first instance rejecting the plaintiff's assertion even if all of the evidence submitted in the court of first instance and the statements in Gap evidence Nos. 10 through 13 (including the paper numbers) submitted in the court of first instance are examined, is justified

Therefore, the court's explanation on this case is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance except for the dismissal of some contents as follows. Thus, it is citing this as it is in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure

The second below the judgment of the court of first instance is to read the second below as “a statement to insult”. The second below is to read “a statement to insult.”

The term "(paragraph 1)" in the last sentence of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be read as "(paragraph 3)".

The May first sentence of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be "(No. 3)" as "(No. 1)."

In the 8th session of the first instance judgment, the "to be deliberated" between the fifth session and the fifth session shall be reviewed, and the "to be deliberated."

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit, and it is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow