Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the representative of B.

The Defendant, with the knowledge of the fact that the Defendant had employed a unemployed youth through an employment center and an operating agency, knowingly provided a "small and medium enterprise employment internship project" with an amount equivalent to 50% of the monthly salary per person for six months to the business owner who has employed the unemployed youth as an intern by the injured Republic of Korea’s employment department, he was willing to receive the subsidy by submitting a false work book, a false statement of employment, etc. to the Ministry of Labor and an operating agency of the Ministry of Labor as if he had employed the unemployed youth as an intern and suggesting that the unemployed youth would be employed as an intern.

1. On November 19, 2012, the Defendant submitted an application for subsidies for employment internship to D at a B office located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Seoul Metropolitan Government Office for Employment and Labor of the Victim Republic of Korea (hereinafter referred to as “Worknetnet computer system and operating agency, etc.”).

However, fact D is an employee who has been employed in B before.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received from the victim, the total sum of KRW 3,586,230 on November 19, 2012, KRW 80,000, KRW 73,30 on December 5, 2012, and KRW 3,586,230 on the pretext of the grants for employment internship from the victim’s bank account under B to the national bank account in the name of B, and received subsidies by fraudulent means at the same time.

2. On October 18, 2013, at the above B office, the Defendant submitted an application for subsidies for employment internship support to E on the “worknetnet” computer system and the confirmation stamp for the victim’s employment in the Ministry of Labor as well as the operating body of the Ministry of Labor.

However, in fact, E is an employee who has been employed in B before.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim and deceiving the victim, was a national bank account in the name of B, under the name of the national bank account in the name of B, for employment internship support.