1. The Defendant completed the period of prescription for acquisition of possession on October 25, 1988 with respect to the land area of 721 square meters in Jeonnam-gun, Jeonnam-gun.

The Plaintiff asserts that he purchased the instant real estate from the Defendant on October 25, 1968, around 1968, the amount of 721 square meters in Jeonnam-gun C, Jeonnam-gun (hereinafter “instant real estate”). However, there is no evidence to acknowledge this, and there is no reason for the Plaintiff’s primary claim.

However, the plaintiff asserts that the acquisition by prescription was completed by possession of the instant real estate in peace and public performance from October 25, 1968 with the intention of possession from October 25, 1968. According to each of the evidence Nos. 1 to 4, the plaintiff can recognize the fact that the plaintiff occupies the instant real estate from the above date and time, and embling the farmer, and the possessor is presumed to have occupied the instant real estate in good faith, peace, and public performance pursuant to Article 197(1) of the Civil Act. Thus, the plaintiff's preliminary

The plaintiff's conjunctive claim is accepted, and the main claim is dismissed, and it is so decided as per Disposition.