logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2019.09.10 2019가단826
소유권이전등기
Text

1. The Plaintiff’s answer 1,570 square meters in the Republic of Korea, Jeonnam-gun;

A. As to shares of Defendant B, Defendant C, and Defendant D, each of which is 2/11.

Reasons

1. As to the primary claim against the defendant B, C, and D

A. Indication of Claim: The part as to Defendant B, C, and D in the attached Form “the primary cause of claim”

(b) Applicable provisions of Acts: Judgment made by deemed confession (Article 208 (3) 2 and Article 150 (3) of the Civil Procedure Act);

C. Since accepting the main claim against the above Defendants, it is not necessary to determine the first preliminary claim against the above Defendants and the second preliminary claim against the above Defendants.

2. As to the claim against Defendant E

A. The Plaintiff’s husband’s husband’s death on July 18, 2016 and agreed on the Plaintiff’s sole inheritance of the Plaintiff’s inherited property of the Plaintiff 3,9,10,17,18, and the Plaintiff’s husband’s husband’s deceased on September 2, 2003 (hereinafter “instant land”). The Plaintiff’s husband’s husband’s death on September 18, 2016, did not conflict between the parties or by the Plaintiff’s agreement on the Plaintiff’s sole inheritance of the inherited property of the Plaintiff 3,9,10,17, 18, 19, and 19 (including numbers).

B. 1) The Plaintiff’s primary claim entered into a sales contract with the deceased G on March 25, 1982 to purchase the instant land from the deceased G, and Defendant E, who inherited the deceased G’s inherited property according to the inheritance shares, asserts that the Plaintiff, who solely inherited the deceased’s right to the instant land, has the obligation to implement the registration procedure for transfer of ownership for the 5/11 shares of the instant land on March 25, 1982. 2) The Plaintiff’s primary claim is insufficient to recognize that the deceased H entered into the sales contract with the deceased G on March 25, 1982 only with the statement of evidence No. 4,5,6,7,7, and8 on March 25, 1982.

Therefore, the defendant E is the primary part of the case.

arrow