logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.09.22 2017고단2712
공무집행방해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On January 25, 2017, the injured Defendant: (a) 00:25, at the main point of “D” located in Yeongdeungpo-gu, Suwon-si, Suwon-si; and (b) on the ground that the victim, while drinking alcohol together with the victim E (20 years of age) who is a vegetative victim, she called “I am am am am am son who is emotionally dead upon drinking alcohol; and (c) when the victim’s face part of the victim’s face cannot be known to the victim, the injured Defendant am am on the face of the victim’s face.

2. 공무집행 방해 피고인은 제 1 항 기재 일시, 장소에서 “ 한명이 미쳐서 날뛰고 다른 사람을 팬다” 라는 내용의 112 신고를 받고 현장에 출동한 수원 남부 경찰서 F 지구대 소속 피해자 순경 G 등이 콜라병을 들고 소란을 피우는 피고인의 행위를 제지하면서 수갑을 채우려고 하자 화가 나 피해자에게 “ 내가 왜 수갑 차야 돼, 이 씨 발 새끼야, 왜 수갑 채워, 이 씨 발 놈들 아 ”라고 욕설을 하면서 손으로 피해자의 몸통을 1회 강하게 밀치고, 피해자의 손을 꺾고, 피해자의 손을 잡고 바닥을 향해 끌어당기고, 계속하여 피해 자가 피고인을 112 순찰차에 태우려고 하자 큰소리를 지르면서 피해자의 다리 부위를 1회 걷어찼다.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of reported cases and criminal investigations by police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The witness H and G respective legal statements;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspects of E;

1. A written statement of I;

1. Application of on-site photographs, photographs damaged by interfering with the performance of official duties, and statutes governing injury photographs;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties), Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of injuring an injury) and the selection of each fine concerning the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Judgment on the assertion by the Defendant and his defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

arrow