logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원순천지원 2016.12.08 2016가합11692
유치권확인 청구
Text

1. It is confirmed that the Plaintiff has a lien on each real estate listed in the separate sheet.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On May 14, 2015, the Plaintiff entered into a contract for construction works with the Defendant on the real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant construction site”) with respect to the construction works during which the Defendant’s factory is newly constructed (hereinafter “instant construction works”). The main contents are as follows.

The name of a construction project: The date of the commencement of the first day of May 26, 2015, from among the new construction works of KSD factories: The contract amount of KRW 1,690,000 (Additional tax separate) for the first day of August 25, 2015: Within 169,00,000 after the contract was made: The completed amount of KRW 1,183,00,000 for the second day of a request for a base based on the cata: The remainder of KRW 338,00,000 within 14 days after the completion of construction: Within 14 days after the contract was made.

B. On September 18, 2015, the Plaintiff entered into a contract with the Defendant to alter the instant construction work, and its main contents are as follows.

The name of a construction project: The date of the start of May 26, 2015, from among the new construction works of KSD factories: the amount of contract for the 3,623,39,500 won in VT 362,39,500 = 1,470,000, VAT 14,700,70,000 won = 1,614,617,700,000 won = 1,614,70,000 won = 1,617,39,000, 105,000 won in total or 14,70,000 won in total, or 1,617,000,000 won in total or in total: 00,000 won in total, or 16,005 won in total or in total,00,000 won in advance after the contract.

C. On July 21, 2015, the Defendant paid the Plaintiff KRW 230,00,000,000 in total, as the completion payment for the instant construction project, and KRW 230,000,000 in total, September 23, 2015.

The Plaintiff, while failing to receive the construction cost on October 13, 2015, has reached an agreement with the Defendant on the instant construction cost (hereinafter “instant agreement”).

arrow