logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2015.03.17 2014고정464
업무방해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 6 million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The victims of 2014 high-level 464 victims C interfered with the interior works and business affairs of the victims by force, such as delaying the interior works set forth in 106 and 4.5 million won for additional personnel expenses, by delaying the interior works set forth in 106 and 107 in the above shopping district, and the victims E are the tenants of 106 and 107 in the above commercial building, notwithstanding the fact that the Defendant is not the manager of the management office elected in accordance with the formal procedure, and by force, resulting in the delay in the interior works set forth in 106 and 107 in the above commercial building, and causing sales losses at the date of opening the business.

On October 7, 2013, when the victim C, the owner of the instant commercial building Nos. 106 and 107, requested the key of the instant commercial building and the key of the instant commercial building Nos. 106 and 107, the Defendant refused to provide the key of the distribution box, thereby hindering the victim C and E’s interior interior interior interior 106 and 107.

B. On October 8, 2013, around 12:00, around 15:00, and around 22:00 on three occasions, the Defendant: (a) received a request from the victim C to “the key to distribute electricity or to supply electricity” on three occasions; (b) refused such request; and (c) obstructed the Plaintiff’s construction of the above shopping mall.

C. On October 12, 2013, the Defendant knew that the victim C intended to open the door of the commercial distribution box and supply electricity to the above building and to carry out the construction work. On the same day, at around 17:00 on the same day, he set an electric blocking device, and changed the key of the power distribution box, thereby hindering the Plaintiff’s construction of the above commercial building interior.

On October 19, 2013, the Defendant supplied electricity by the victim C in order to cut off the power distribution box of the above building. On October 19, 2013, the Defendant obstructed the construction of the above shopping mall for the victims by blocking electricity again.

2. Although the Defendant is not the Director of the Commercial Building Management Office appointed by the regular procedure from the owners of the commercial building, the Defendant is the first floor of the commercial building in this case around 08:30 on October 9, 2013.

arrow