logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 홍성지원 2013.04.12 2013고단136
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On November 16, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to one year and six months of imprisonment for a crime, such as fraud, at the Seoul Central District Court, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on January 23, 2012, and was released from Daejeon Prison on November 30, 2012, and the execution of the said sentence was terminated on January 23, 2013.

On April 11, 2009, the Defendant, along with C, D, D, April 11, 2009, E, September 5, 2008, F, Sep. 5, 2008, 2008, who was not aware of the name of “G” and/or his/her name, made phone calls to unspecified persons to post offices, employees of the Financial Supervisory Service, the police, and other investigative agencies, and by deceiving them to be able to protect the deposits related to illegal funds, and by inducing unspecified persons to put their numbers into their cash cards, etc. during cash withdrawal, and by inducing them to receive money from the account opened by the Defendants.

Therefore, a person who could not know his/her name has induced an unspecified person to transfer the money from a cash withdrawal period to an unspecified person, and C, D, F, etc. shall withdraw the amount that the victims transferred to the criminal account from the cash payment period, and the Defendant shall transport the cash withdrawn by C, D, and the name “G” shall share the respective roles to provide the Defendants with the cash card and recover the withdrawn cash.

1. On August 11, 2008, the Defendant, in collusion with C, D, E, F, G, and false names, called the victim I's house in the North Cheongong-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, North Cheongbuk-gun, and misrepresented the post office staff and the staff of the Financial Supervisory Service, who "personal information is using the card by illegal use. The personal information may be withdrawn by a post office credit card and may be damaged by fraudulent use. To prevent the omission of cash."

Afterwards, the Defendants made the aforementioned deceptive act.

arrow