The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (4 months of imprisonment) of the lower court is too unreasonable (the Defendant did not submit a written grounds for appeal, but all the facts charged at an investigative agency and the lower court recognized the facts charged and the Defendant wishesed to be given the opportunity to agree with the victim by recognizing the facts charged, even in the reflectivity submitted to the first instance court on April 18, 2016, etc.). 2. The instant crime of this case is deemed to have been lodged on the grounds of unfair sentencing. The instant crime of this case was deemed to have been filed on the grounds of unfair sentencing, as if the Defendant were to work at a entertainment place, and was given a false and unfair payment, and even if the Defendant had had the record of being sentenced to a fine several times due to the same kind of crime, the Defendant committed the instant crime again.

The amount of damage is high.

Although the defendant could not agree in the court below, the defendant would agree in the court below.

The court did not appear on the trial date after the trial and did not contact, and in the trial, the court did not appear on the trial date without any special reason and did not reflect the error.

It is difficult to see it.

In addition, considering various sentencing conditions shown in the records and arguments, such as the age, character and environment of the defendant and the circumstances before and after the crime, the sentence of the court below against the defendant is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.