(영문) 서울고등법원 2020.08.20 2019나2021864

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울고등법원 2020.08.20 2019나2021864

손해배상(기)

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

1. The plaintiff's grounds for appeal citing the judgment of the court of first instance are not significantly different from the allegations in the court of first instance, and even if the evidence additionally examined in the court of first instance was examined in the evidence adopted in the court of first instance, the fact-finding and judgment of the court of first instance

Therefore, this court's reasoning is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the cases of using or deleting some parts as follows. Thus, this court's reasoning is accepted by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act

[Supplementary or deleted parts] Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the plaintiff's assertion that the plaintiff's act is invalid as an unfair legal act against the defendant B, a declaration of intention that is not a truth, or a false declaration of intention that has conspired with the plaintiff's intention to cancel the contract due to the non-performance of obligation, and the part of judgment on the claim for invalidation, the claim for rescission of the contract due to the non-performance of obligation, and each of them (Articles 11 through 7, 11, 7, 6 through 11, 7, 8, 13 through 10, 9, 18, 7, 1

The difference between the remaining parts of the judgment of the first instance is deemed to be uniformly changed except for the deleted parts.

Part 12 of the judgment of the court of first instance, "K for witnesses" shall be replaced by "K for witnesses of the court of first instance and L for the trial."

2. According to the conclusion, the Plaintiff’s claim against the Defendants ought to be dismissed in entirety due to the lack of reasonable grounds.

Since the judgment of the first instance is consistent with this conclusion, all appeals filed by the Plaintiff against the Defendants are dismissed.

참조조문

-민사소송법 제420조

유사 판례

-서울중앙지방법원 2018.09.18 2018나5231

-서울고등법원 2019.12.19 2017나37333

-서울중앙지방법원 2017.08.22 2017나22437

-서울고등법원 2018.05.24 2018나2000068

-서울고등법원 2017.05.12 2016나2071998