Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Around June 201, the Defendant considered that he would be able to pay a large amount of money to the Republic of Korea with a foreigner of the AFististan nationality. Around June 201, the Defendant introduced the D (D) of the Defendant’s E-company’s E-company E-company E-company E (F)’s E-company E-company E-company E (F)’s E-company E-company E-company E-company E (F)’s E-company E-company E-company E’s E-company E-company E-company E-company E-company’s false invitation to enter the Republic of Korea.
As a result, G prepared and delivered to D documents necessary for visa issuance, such as a false invitation letter stating that “the defendant would import the Textiles source” from E company in the absence of an intention to import the Textiles source, and a letter of fidelity guarantee stating that “the defendant will guarantee his/her identity in connection with his/her stay in the Republic of Korea,” and C delivered the said documents to D via C.
Around September 12, 2011, the Defendant applied for a short-term visa (C-21) at the Embassy of the Republic of Korea of AFIstan located in AfIstan, and entered the Republic of Korea through the Incheon Airport on October 4, 2011, when the Defendant submitted a false invitation letter, a letter of fidelity guarantee, etc. to a public official in charge of visa issuance who is aware of the fact that the documents necessary for the issuance of the visa, such as the document, are true and correct, and had an interview to verify the purpose of entry from the public official in charge of official in charge, and entered the Republic of Korea for business purposes. The Defendant received a short-term visa (C-21) from the public official in charge of official in charge on the 13th of the same month, and entered the Republic of Korea through the Incheon Airport on October 4, 2011.
As a result, the defendant interferes with legitimate execution of duties concerning visa issuance duties of public officials belonging to the Embassy of the Republic of Korea of the Republic of Korea by deceptive means, and at the same time, foreigners are domestically.