(영문) 대구지방법원 2016.05.27 2015노2616 | 리걸엔진

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 대구지방법원 2016.05.27 2015노2616

위증

Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The accused of the grounds for appeal was seated forward of the bus at the time, and he was seated behind the bus; and

C A sound has been cut in the name of the defendant, and the defendant has been seated in front of the bus, and the defendant only moved to the rear knee of the bus, and D cannot be considered to have been seated over the knee of C, and there is no knee of C.

The Defendant appeared as a witness of the Daegu District Court Pohang Branch 2013 High Order 1346, which stated the facts in accordance with his memory as above.

However, the lower court erred by misapprehending the fact that the lower court found the Defendant guilty of the instant facts charged, thereby adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

2. Determination

A. The lower court found the Defendant guilty of this part of the facts charged based on the evidence in its judgment.

B. The judgment of this court 1) In light of the difference between the method of evaluating the credibility of the first instance court and the appellate court in accordance with the spirit of the substantial direct trial principle adopted by the Korean Criminal Procedure Act as an element of the trial-oriented principle, the first instance court’s decision was clearly erroneous in its determination on the credibility of the statement made by the witness of the first instance court in light of the contents of the first instance judgment and the evidence duly examined by the first instance court.

Unless there are extenuating circumstances to see the credibility of the statement made by a witness of the first instance trial and the result of further examination of evidence conducted by the time the appellate trial is final and conclusive, the appellate court should not reverse without permission the first instance judgment on the ground that the first instance judgment on the credibility of the statement made by the witness of the first instance is different from the appellate court’s judgment (see Supreme Court Decision 201Do5313, Jun. 14, 2012). 2) The lower court directly examined C, and then recognized the credibility of the testimony.

참조판례

-대법원 2012. 6. 14. 선고 2011도5313 판결

유사 판례

-전주지방법원 2016.09.29 2016노528

-부산지방법원 2017.10.27 2017노2727

-대전지방법원 2017.12.07 2017노2740

-서울북부지방법원 2018.08.16 2018노683

-대법원 2017.09.07 2017도8280