logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.10.26 2012구합14782
보상금증액청구
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 1,83,712,170 for the Plaintiff and KRW 5% per annum from October 16, 2012 to October 26, 2016.

Reasons

1. Details of ruling;

A. The Plaintiff, a company established on January 21, 1982, has produced and sold semiconductor-related equipment, parts, etc. at a factory located in Cheongsung-si, Cheongsung-si, Cheongsung-si (hereinafter “instant existing factory”).

(b) Project approval and public notice - Housing site development project (hereinafter referred to as the "project in this case") - Public notice: The Defendant:

C. The Central Land Expropriation Committee’s ruling on expropriation on September 14, 2012 (hereinafter “instant adjudication on expropriation”) - Persons eligible for compensation and amount of compensation: Attached to the attached Form

1. Attached Form 9,453,220,920 won, business losses 3,580,73,320 won, and attached Table 9,453,220,920 won, buildings, structures, and trees in the list of buildings, and trees (hereinafter “instant buildings, structures, and trees”);

2. Transfer expenses for business facilities indicated in the business facility list (hereinafter “instant business facilities”) 1,389,166,660 won £« 2,191,60 won including operating income for three months of suspension of business, etc. - From the date of commencement of expropriation: - An appraisal corporation on October 15, 2012 - An appraisal corporation: A corporation: A flood appraisal corporation; a future appraisal corporation for a stock company; and a future appraisal corporation for a stock company (hereinafter “adjudication appraiser”); the results of the appraisal are “appraisal”.

[The facts without dispute over the basis of recognition, Gap evidence No. 1, Eul evidence No. 1 and No. 2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion 1) The appraisal was not based on the date of the adjudication of expropriation when calculating the repurchasing cost of the instant building. Although the instant building is a reinforced concrete structure and its service life is evaluated as “60 years”, it was calculated unfairly lower the amount of compensation for the instant building by evaluating it as “40 years”. 2) The relocation of the instant business facility requires high precision and is different within three months.

arrow