logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2015.03.31 2012구합14553
영업손실보상금
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 794,037,912 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate from November 8, 2012 to March 31, 2015, and the following.

Reasons

1. Details of ruling;

A. The Plaintiff, a company established on March 23, 2001, newly constructed a factory building (hereinafter “instant factory”) on the 6 block of the Yannam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-do, Busan-do, Busan-gun, and then produced and sold chemical products, such as pointing and sorting agents for the protection of optical films, etc. in the said factory.

(b) Project approval and public notice - Project name: Urban development project (63j) (hereinafter referred to as the “instant project”): Defendant

C. The Central Land Tribunal’s adjudication on expropriation on September 14, 2012 (hereinafter “instant adjudication on expropriation”): Buildings, trees, business facilities, etc. in the instant factory - All the articles listed in the separate sheet Nos. 1 through 115 (the articles listed in the separate sheet Nos. 52 through 115 “instant business facilities” among them) - Compensation for losses: Total sum of 2,059,566,220 won (i.e., the number Nos. 1 through 22 listed in the separate sheet Nos. 526,286,480 Nos. 23 through 51 of the amount of compensation for each of the buildings listed in the separate sheet Nos. 15,650,000 won, the amount of compensation for the instant business facilities 1,487,700,000 won, or the remainder of the business facilities excluding the amount of compensation for the instant business facilities is not disputed, and thus, the Plaintiff shall only be compensated for the instant business facilities.

- An appraisal corporation: An appraisal corporation on November 7, 2012 - An appraisal corporation: an appraisal corporation on a substitute appraisal corporation, an appraisal corporation on a stock company (hereinafter referred to as “adjudication appraiser”) and an appraisal corporation on a stock company (hereinafter referred to as “adjudication appraiser,” and the results of the appraisal

D. The result of the court’s entrustment to appraiser A (hereinafter “court appraiser A”, “court appraisal”) - The result of the appraisal commission is subject to appraisal: the period of suspension of business and the amount of business loss compensation related to the transfer of the business facility of this case - the contents of appraisal: the period of suspension of business due to the relocation of the business facility of this case.

arrow