Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for one year and by imprisonment for ten months.

(2) the date of this judgment.

Punishment of the crime

Defendants, at around 23:45 on May 30, 2016, at the F party district located in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Cheong-gu, Ma, G, the main owner of the party gu, Ma-gu, Ma-gu, Ma-gu as the Gu party Ma-guC.

Defendants 1 and 2

G’s desire, and the victim H(39) was expressed to the Defendants, whether or not the victim H(39) expressed to the Defendants “I wish to be the principal of the party.”

“In the end, it became a vision.”

Defendant

A marks the head of the victim one time by displaying a dangerous object, and the victim satise his left hand in the face of the victim as he preventss his head with his left hand, and the defendant B satiseed twice the victim's face with his hand.

As a result, the Defendants conspired in collusion with the victim to carry a dangerous documentary form, and caused injury to the victim, such as double-water dulverization of heavy water dulp to the left-hand side, which requires approximately eight weeks medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. The Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each legal statement of the witness H, G, and I;

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. An injury diagnosis certificate (H);

1. Photographs (A, B, and H);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (to hear statements from a wooden shot person);

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Articles 258-2 (1), 257 (1), and 30 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of punishment, and the choice of imprisonment, respectively;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Judgment on the assertion of Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act regarding an order to attend a lecture or an order to provide community service

1. The assertion;

A. Defendant A: (a) Recognizing the fact that the Defendant was a party documentary at the time and place of the ruling, the fact was found, but this did not inflict an injury upon the victim at the time and place of the ruling.

The main body of the victim's alley is not the upper body created from the defendant, but the victim's use of the defendant A outside of the billiard.

B. Defendant B: Although there are less than twice victims, even if Defendant A was at the time of the victim under the oral documentary account, Defendant B is aware of this fact and used, and thus, there is no special crime of injury.

2. The evidence duly adopted and examined by the determination.