Defendant

A Imprisonment for one year, and each of the defendants B shall be punished by a fine of 1,000,000 won.

Defendant

B The above fine.

Punishment of the crime

1. On July 20, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 11:50 on July 20, 2015, the Defendant: (b) was under the influence of alcohol in a small-scale store adjacent to the main apartment building in Asan-si, Eup-Myeon; and (c) was an influence of the victim B ( South, 58 years old); (d) on one occasion, the left end part of the victim B’s left end part of the apartment building in the shopping district; and (e) was

2. Defendant B, at the same time and place as described in paragraph 1, was assaulted by the victim A ( South Korea, 55 years of age) as above, and was inflicted on the victim’s face on two occasions due to the drinking of the victim, the Defendant inflicted an injury on the victim, such as a non-alley dys that require approximately four weeks of treatment, by considering the victim’s face.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant B’s legal statement

1. The defendant A's partial statement

1. Inbound descriptions in two copies of the medical certificate of injury;

1. Application of the video Acts and subordinate statutes to photographic materials;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and subparagraph A of the option of punishment against the crime: Articles 258-2 and 257 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendant B who is detained in a workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant A who has been suspended from execution: Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (The following circumstances shall be considered as favorable to the reasons for sentencing);

1. Defendant B of the provisional payment order: Defendant A’s defense counsel on the guilty ground of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, merely because the degree of the injured party’s wife he suffered is minor to the extent that the injured party’s wife would be naturally cured, it does not constitute an injury under the Criminal Act.

The argument is asserted.

However, the following circumstances acknowledged by each evidence of the judgment, i.e., (i) Defendant A is under the influence of alcohol, but Defendant B is unable to accurately memory the situation at the time, and the specific statement was made by Defendant B. According to Defendant B’s statement, Defendant A was trying to satise Defendant B as a satisfyer’s disease even after Defendant B’s head was broken, and Defendant B’s head was broken, and Defendant A appears to have satisfed with the satisf’s disease. (ii)