Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On July 25, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to one year imprisonment at the Cheongju District Court to a suspended sentence of two years for fraud, and thereafter, the Defendant is the Plaintiff of the lawsuit seeking return of unjust enrichment by Cheongju District Court 2014Da34178, which became final and conclusive, and C is the Defendant of the said civil case.

1. On August 5, 2013, the Defendant forged private documents refers to a person who had worked as the head of the accounting office by using a computer for the purpose of uttering D 1110 of the Cheongju-si Office for the purpose of uttering, and (Joint) E representative A, who had served as the head of the accounting office by the end of May 2013, 2013, who has received double payment by abusing labor law while receiving interim retirement pay.""On August 5, 2013, 2013, the Defendant printed the contents of "F," "F," "N, the representative E member of the limited partnership company," and forged a F’s certificate of fact in the name of F, a private document related to the certification.

2. On September 11, 2013, the Defendant submitted a complaint with respect to a lawsuit seeking return of unjust enrichment (2014da34178), which was filed against C at the Cheongju District Court’s general civil petition office located in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Busan, about 62-ro, 51-ro, Cheongju-do, and submitted the forged confirmation document to a person who is unaware of the circumstances, and exercised it.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness F;

1. The description of the accused's partial statement and F's statement in the first police interrogation protocol, the second police interrogation protocol against the accused on the accused;

1. Each police statement of C;

1. A factual confirmation of the F name (No. 5 No. 5 of the evidence list);

1. Previous convictions: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each judgment (No. 23);

1. Relevant Article 231 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, the choice of punishment, and Articles 234 and 231 of the Criminal Act;

1. To treat concurrent crimes;